Brian Jackson

Associate Professor of Physics at Boise State University

  • About
  • Research
    • CV
    • Joining the Boise State Planetary Science Research Group
    • Research Experiences for Undergrads
    • Ultra-short-period planet database
    • The Short Period Planets Group — S(u)PerP(i)G
    • Google Scholar Page
    • Code
  • Teaching
  • Press
  • Extracurricular Activities
    • Field Trips
      • Bruneau Sand Dunes – 2022 Jun 29
  • Public Outreach
    • Boise State’s Astronomical Observatory
    • Central Idaho Dark Sky Reserve STEM Network

Counting Up the Unseen Worlds

Posted by admin on October 8, 2021
Posted in: Public Outreach, Research. Tagged: close-in exoplanets, hot jupiters.
Illustration of the hot-Jupiter exoplanet WASP-12b. From https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/planet-eater.html.

WASP-12 b is in trouble. A giant ball of mostly hydrogen, the planet circles its star once every 25 hours. The resulting intense stellar irradiation drives super-sonic storms of plasma around the world, and the atmosphere has so much thermal energy, in fact, that some of it is escaping into space. But it gets worse. WASP-12 b is steadily tumbling toward its host star, and astronomers expect that, within a few million years, the star will eat the planet.

WASP-12 b is one of a few hundred hot Jupiters, gas giants very close to their stars, and so far, it’s the only one we have confirmed in a death spiral. Many other hot Jupiters probably are probably also condemned, but how many more can we find perched on the edge of destruction? And, come to think of it, how did the planets find themselves in such precarious positions in the first place? To answer these questions, astronomers need to understand how many hot Jupiters there are out there and how many more are left to be found.

Party Like It’s 1995

The telescope at the Haute-Provence Observatory in France used to discover 51 Peg b in 1995. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haute-Provence_Observatory.

In 1995, Michael Mayor and Didier Queloz announced the discovery of the very first extrasolar planet around a Sun-like star, 51 Pegasi b (it was not, however, the first exoplanet discovered). Although this discovery revolutionized astronomy (indeed, it won Mayor and Queloz the Nobel Prize in 2019), it was nothing like what was expected. In his book, New Worlds in the Cosmos, Mayor describes their initial reaction: “We couldn’t keep this mysterious object out of our minds. Its strange properties [were] so unexpected, so clearly absurd…”.

All these first exoplanets discovered around Sun-like stars, 51 Pegasi b included, were hot Jupiters, but these weren’t the first type of planet found because they are the most common type. Like the loudest guest at a house party, they are simply the easiest to notice. With their hulking sizes and tiny orbits, hot Jupiters yank their host stars around, giving rise to a large Doppler signal that astronomers can more easily detect in the stars’ spectra. Hot Jupiters that transit their stars also cast very deep shadows that can even be detected by amateur-class telescopes.

An exoplanet transit. From https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v4SRfmoTuU.

Because of these detection biases, the number of hot Jupiters we’ve detected is not the same as the actual number of hot Jupiters in our galaxy. It’s not even the same as the number of hot Jupiters we *might* be able to detect but just haven’t yet. So what weird and wild worlds await wevelation?

All the Worlds We Cannot See

That’s the question Samuel Yee, an astronomy graduate student at Princeton, recently set out to answer. In a recent paper, he and his colleagues look at all 40 hot Jupiters seen transiting by NASA’s Kepler Mission. With these planents, Yee and colleagues tried to estimate how many other transiting hot Jupiters might still be detectable but not yet detected. So how did they use planets they could see to count up planets they didn’t?

Imagine you were the stocking manager for the Boise State bookstore, and you wanted to know how many orange and blue Boise State t-shirts to buy for the fans attending an upcoming football game. You could, for example, look at a photo of a recent game and count up the proportion of blue and orange t-shirts.

A recent Boise State football game. From https://broncosports.com/sports/2018/5/18/facilities-albertsons-stadium-safety-html.aspx.

To save time, you decide to count only a few stadium sections, assuming that those sections are representative of all sections. Unfortunately, the photo was taken at night, so some of the sections are not very well lit. You guess that you can accurately count only about half the people those sections. So you do your count and then inflate the number of counted orange and blue t-shirts both to account both for the darkening (multiplying by two) and the total number of sections (dividing by ratio of counted to total sections).

This is the kind of statistical reasoning that astronomers do all the time and that Samuel Yee and colleagues did to extrapolate from Kepler’s transiting hot Jupiters. For instance, since it was harder for Kepler to detect transits for dimmer stars, they scale up the number of transiting hot Jupiters around dimmer stars.

After correcting for all the detection biases they could, Yee and colleagues suggest that, although Kepler was wildly successful finding planets, there are still a lot of hot Jupiters out there, awaiting discovery. Yee estimates that more than 500 additional hot Jupiters may be found by Kepler’s successor, the ongoing TESS mission.

Coming Home Again

That’s a lot of t-shirts to count. So what might these new planets tell us? Well, astronomers still don’t understand where hot Jupiters come from. Some astronomers have suggested they form much farther from their host stars and only reach their perilous orbits after violent orbital perturbations. Other theories posit that the planets were born hot.

One scenario for creating a hot Jupiter.

Figuring out which, if either, of these theories explains their origins is key for understanding the early histories of all planetary systems since their enormous masses mean Jupiter-sized planets are the bullies of their planetary systems. Indeed, previous studies suggest that hot Jupiters are lonely, with few to no other planets in their systems. This result probably means that the process that makes hot Jupiters destabilizes any other planets in the system, throw them into their stars or ejecting them from their systems.

The fact that our solar system has so many small planets orbiting alongside two Jupiter-sized planets may mean that we never had a hot Jupiter. On the other hand, the Sun shows an unusual chemical composition compared to other similar stars, consistent with the possibility that our system long ago hosted a hot Jupiter that was later swallowed by the Sun.

So as exotic as hot Jupiters may seem, they may actually be more familiar than we ever expected.

Posts navigation

← The planet that flew too close to its sun
The Planetary Science Journal Publication Process →
  • Twitter: decaelus

    Brian Jackson
    • Come join us at @BoiseState for an exoplanets and outreach postdoc - https://t.co/LgQkDfkVJd. Apps due by end of Ap… https://t.co/37IiiVvl6D 08:41:55 2023 Mar 8
    • Records show powerful, wealthy funders outside Idaho back school choice campaign https://t.co/tzrZgyYk4U via @idahocapitalsun 11:03:33 2023 Feb 3
    • Learn how to save the dark (https://t.co/CqYzD5o2Xh at @BroncoPhysics First Friday Astronomy event this Fri (Feb 3… https://t.co/8B3Set3tW0 11:49:28 2023 Jan 30
    @decaelus
  • Recent Posts

    • LPSC 2023
    • Taking the Universe’s Measure
    • Research Group Meeting – 2023 Mar 2
    • Resources for the Jupiter-Venus Conjunction
    • PHYS305 – 2023 Mar 1
  • Archives

    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Parament by Automattic.